My response to the apologists of officialdom

If there's one thing I learned while studying conspiracy theories, it is the fact that the researcher will encounter many dissenters who do not wish you to even open up a particular subject.

I remember, back in 2003 when I started looking into the 911, I was met with harsh criticism for looking into such a horrible event with a criticle angle. It turns out, however, that enough evidence emerged to convince most of the Americans that parts of their own government were complicit in the massacre that took place on that day. Had no researchers come forth asking the tough questions regarding the 911, it is likely that the United States would have turned into an Orwellian nightmare, more-so than it already has.

I find that critics of these sorts of alternative history theories tend to respond to scientific and historical evidence with attacks on the researcher; they figure that things cannot possibly be other than what they believe and will simply not listen. Often, they are even willing to rationalize all of their doubts away by changing the flawed official story to fit the facts; this is denial at its greatest. Such apologists have my contempt, they are so entrenched in their beliefs in officialdom that they are not willing to, for even a moment, venture into territory that makes their ideas vulnerable.

I have been looking aroud long enough to realize that things are often not at all what the general public believes them to be; hence I enjoy inquiries into alternative theories and am more than willing post my findings, even while morons stumble over themselves to throw mud at me. You can slander me all you want, but you are only defeating yourself by showing your utter ignorance to the discovery of any new concepts or ideas.

You are likely to get about as far as the 911 apologists did, when they tried, time and again, to silence the debate with mud throwing and assults one one's person. They were not able to silence the voice of truth, and consequently people throughout the world are starting to realize that the elite often regard the people as cannon fodder, when it comes to fulfilling their agendas.

Whether or not one believes that things aren't what they seem, it is essential that they venture outside of the cocoon society places each of us in. This cocoon defines what is sacred and what is profane. When I hear that something is profane, I want to know why and, most importantly, who benefits from society believing in such a way.

If discovering the unadulterated truth means getting into subjects that are painful, then so be it. In order to keep our heads above water it is often necessary to have our feet held to the fire so that we might realize, more aptly, how everything fits together. If we stop paying attention and have unconditional trust for officialdom and all of their rationalizations, then we very well end up slaves to the powers that be.