oklahoma city bombing: startling evidence proves cover-up

I stumbled upon a couple of interesting videos on this subject lately. The first is an in-depth analysis of the incidents surrounding the bombing of the Murrah building. The people interviewed discus the bombs that were placed in the building by the ATF, John Doe II, the non-existant blast crater that the feds erected a plywood covering over; the list goes on and on....

Overview of the OKC Bombing case created by State Representative Charles Key.

• Takes a look at major issues regarding the cover up by the FBI and Justice Department.
• Including: Eyewitnesses, Other Bombs found and Prior Knowledge.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3272698624135234456

The second video is a collection of news reports indicating that there were at least 3 bombs in the Murrah building.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=JMBvX3P8IjE

Disinformation: After the bombing, while the rescue attempts were going on, the Oklahoma TV News stations were reporting that the police and ATF officials were saying that there were more undetonated bombs found in the building. The TV newsmen kept reporting this for hours. Police logs confirmed undetonated bombs were found, and so did FEMA reports. Even Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating, on the morning of the bombing, said, "The reports I have is that one device was deactivated, and apparently, there's another device." But since then the government has claimed that all these reports and sightings of other bombs were wrong. That there was only the one McVeigh truck bomb. Does that make sense? Do you believe that?

Charles Key: Yes, the information is just very strong, and to me it's too strong to be able to try to discount it. We have affidavits in our report from paramedics and other rescuers at the scene who say they heard law enforcement people stating there were other bombs found in the building. And then you had bomb experts who had time to drive to a TV station, and sit there, and talk about the un-detonated bombs they had, bombs that were found in the building. You know, it's just too much competent information that can't be reasoned away as mistakes.

Disinformation: In that same TV interview, Governor Keating, who is an ex-FBI agent, said, ". . . obviously, whatever did the damage to the Murrah Building was a tremendous, very sophisticated explosive device." But explosives experts have made it clear that an ANFO bomb is an extremely rudimentary bomb. If someone blew up the building by placing charges on different columns inside the buildings, then that would take a sophisticated knowledge of explosives, right?

Charles Key: Yes. Authorities have said that an ANFO bomb is a very simple, crude bomb.

Disinformation: What might be the most intriguing information you put out in your Final Report is that the most preeminent experts on explosives--people like Sam Cohen and General Partin--have said an ANFO truck bomb could not have possibly done the damage to the Murrah Building. You've said that the Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee tried very hard to find an expert or authority who would say that an ANFO bomb could have done the damage, but you weren't able to, right?

Charles Key: That's true. Yes. We couldn't find anybody who would put their name, put their opinion in writing, that an ANFO truck bomb could have done this. If somebody wants to claim that it could have been done, then they need to put in writing, show how it could work, and give examples of that. And nobody I know of has been able to do that. Not even the witnesses the government used in the trial could do it. They didn't do it...

My impression of the situation is that they wanted to blame a U.S. citizen for the incident because war was not in their plans at this juncture; instead they wanted to pass the legislation which created the secret FISA courts, legislation they would not have been able to pass without a shocking event involving a U.S. citizen in a terrost plot.

We know that Bush Jr. was funded, ever since Arbusto Energy, by the Bin Laden family; perhaps they were involved in the OKC bombing as part of the larger agenda. I certainly wouldn't rule out Israeli involvement in one way or another either; those dirty little fucks seem to be involved in anything that destroys freedom and promotes tyrrany.

I think that the OKC Bombing was a miserable failure on the part of the FBI and ATF, since it appears that their intention was to blow the building sky high and it failed to do so, leaving survivors, wittnesses and most importantly, a standing structure for investigators to examine and determine the impossibility of the official story being true.

It also allowed the people investigating the seismic anomalies to get confirmation of their suspicion of two large explosions, since they were able to study the effects of the final demolition of the crippled building.

They fucked up and didn't manage to detonate several of the bombs that were in the building; therefore they had to get the local rescue workers out of the building, saying that there were other bombs in the building (and there were, though they denied this later), after which they removed the bombs; bombs which were planted in the building by the ATF agents themselves. The FBI then took over and barred anyone but FEDS from the scene, so that the cover-up could be ensured.

The undetonated bombs helped to screw up their cover story, since the local media reported, and several federal officials admitted, that there were at least two other devices in the building. The national news, however, blacked out this information and lead the people to believe that it was just a Ryder truck.

If the building had completely collapsed, as did the WTC towers, it would have been far more difficult to determine that the Ryder truck could not have destroyed the building. But alas, the whole thing was blown open by a few patriotic individuals who were willing to stand up to the government terrorists however they were able.