The Future of Money and Government

The man Forbes describes as Mr. Gold, Jim Sinclair, wrote an intriguing article on the Amero on May 8.

In the article he discussed the possible futures of money in the united States of America as well as the machine that the Republican political system has become, for manufacturing new presidents.

We have all seen Ron Paul has been given the opportunity to participate in the GOP debates. He is the only candidate calling for a return to Constitutional money (backed by Gold/Silver).

This is just a hunch on my part, but perhaps the powers that be are ready to let someone rescue America's economy so the fiat system doesn't kill the "Golden Goose." Perhaps an eminent return to sound money is ESSENTIAL for the survival of the nation and of civilization itself.

November 27, 2006
CNBC Interviews Steve Previs (Jefferies International Ltd.) about the Amero

---

Jim Sinclair Writes:

The Amero was discussed on primetime network TV yesterday. What is included and what is not in the media is not random, it is purposeful.

Many of us have either not heard of this or only heard of it from the splinter far right commentators. It therefore becomes time let all readers know the existence and consideration beyond the level of just talk. Further to this, websites in Canada are springing up seriously opposing this consideration as a takeover of Canada. The people running these sites appear to be solid Canadian citizen.

Things I speak of are simply entities out there. I really hope you did not read that as a prediction because just as the a new, revitalized and modernized Federal Reserve Gold Certificate Ratio, no one knows if anything will occur other than a new low in the dollar and gold above $1000.

Referring to your comments, I would suggest the Supreme Court will sing and dance to the tune of the Republican King Maker if push comes to shove. The Democrats as usual seem not to yet have any viable presidential candidates. The republicans have a machine after so many years in control.

In truth there is one kingmaker and two parties so neither is really significantly different than the other. As such, all possibilities out there need to understood.

All societies from the beginning of mankind have been pyramidal power structures. The many are at the bottom, fewer and fewer as you rise in power, and the one, not a committee, is at the top. The one is the true unseen hand of the famed economist, Adam Smith.

Prediction of policies requires a person willing to make an even greater fool of themselves publicly than those that predict markets...

A packed Supreme Court in matters of a King Maker's demand will not fail to tow the line.

As far as the Constitution goes, you think it is the same as ten years ago? It is a historic piece of paper with modest implications, but losing teeth every day.

So in conclusion, what the man wants, he gets assuming the person at the top is in fact a man. I do not.