Thursday, May 31, 2007

Ron Paul appears on Fox News & CNN Discusses His "Educating Rudy" Campaign

0 comments

More good press for Dr. Paul recently as mainstream television news sources are starting to debate the foreign policy issues that had been so taboo prior to recent developments during the GOP debates.

Ron Paul Appears on Fox News



Discussion on CNN's "Situation Room" about Ron Paul

Here's an interesting video in which CNN discusses Rudy Giuliani's reading assignment from Ron Paul's on the history of U.S. foreign policy. You would think that the man who was given the keys to New York City would know these things, but he's been too busy making money off 9/11 to do any reading.

Read More...

Why Rudy beats Ron Paul Hands Down

1 comments

I just don't understand all of this attraction to Ron Paul. I much prefer the simplicity of Rudy Giuliani. Rudy is a man who has it all figured out, I think he firmly believes in the slogan "you're either with the neo-cons, or you're with the terrorists." This kind of black and white reasoning is exactly what we should have if we are to get the world government that we so desperately need.

Rudy wants to make sure that the law-abiding citizens don't have any guns, this way we can all be certain that only the government and the criminals have guns.

I like that in a candidate, because we all know that the only one you can trust is the government, and the government will protect each and every one of us from cradle to grave. We must also keep in mind that the government would never lie to us or abuse their powers, especially if the citizens weren't permitted to carry guns.

In order to help recruit more support to our great 911 hero, please watch this powerful documentary about "Rudy the Great Hero of the 911."

Without Rudy's administration ignoring the warnings on 9/11, its likely that such a great day would never have occurred and all of those heroes wouldn't have been made. Also, it is likely that the united States of America wouldn't have confronted the network of evil terrosts who "want to kill you and your family."

Rudy knows a thing or two about "protection." Since his family was part of the NYC mob, he has first hand experience at protection rackets. This makes him one of the most fitting candidates for the Oval Office.

The documentary examines Giuliani’s rise to power, his policies and his so-called turnaround of New York City. Interviewing journalists, activists, legal experts, and many of the city’s poor, “Giuliani Time” reveals that while the Mayor touted his Broken Windows, Quality of Life and Zero Tolerance policies, the reality on the streets was police brutality, violations of the First Amendment and racist actions.


Read More...

Neo-CONs Spewing Hatred and Fear

0 comments

The neo-cons have been relentlessly milking 9/11, especially individuals like Rudy Giuliani, who receives over $100,000 per mind-numbing speech to spew his hateful and demagogue-embracing message. All of this, in spite of the fact that he was the one who fucked up and ignored the intelligence about the coming event; as mayor, he was responsible for the city, after-all.

One of my favorite neo-con-isms is, "They want to kill you and your family." And, of course, we need profiteers like Giuliani, Bush, and McCain to protect us from evil. The best way that I know of for them to "protect us from evil" is to get their traitorous asses out of the seat of power and stop blocking people who want to enact meaningful change from representing the people.


Read More...

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Flagging in public sentiment, Neo-Cons resort to splogs.

1 comments

Neo-Con Splog "ronpaulin08.blogspot.com" Says
His and your fantasy is that Ron Paul will be president well keep dreaming and i say this to his one supporter and you know who you are. So its time to pick a winner and not Ron Paul. He is an embarrassment to the united states with his of the wall comment which has done nothing to join the American public together but to tear it apart.

Notice how they made their own blog just to spam against Ron Paul ronpaulin08.blogspot.com. Tis a shame...

I posted them a comment, gee, I wonder if it will be posted...

I know what you mean! Shame on Dr. Paul for citing the 9/11 commission report findings during the debate.

It is also a darn shame that Dr. Paul is always voting with the Constitution during his last few decades in congress. That is just un-American, its not like he and all other lawmakers took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution.

Why America would ever want someone who supports liberty is beyond me. I'd much rather have the government utilizing military tribunals and abolishing habeus corpus than to use the antiquated system of "due process," whatever that is.

The same poster "bloggershaven" also threw up another splog titled "http://ronpaulssupport.blogspot.com" in order to get phony PageRank and Technorati authority.

Read More...

Immigration ‘Compromise’ Sells Out Our Sovereignty

0 comments

by Congressman Ron Paul
May 28, 2007

The much-vaunted Senate “compromise” on immigration is a compromise alright: a compromise of our laws, a compromise of our sovereignty, and a compromise of the Second Amendment. That anyone in Washington believes this is a credible approach to solving our immigration crisis suggests just how out of touch our political elites really are.

The reality is that this bill will grant amnesty to virtually all of the 12 to 20 million illegal aliens in the country today. Supporters use very creative language to try and convince us that amnesty is not really amnesty, but when individuals who have entered the United States illegally are granted citizenship – regardless of the fees they are charged – what you have is amnesty.

What is seldom discussed in the immigration debate, unfortunately, is the incentives the US government provides for people to enter the United States illegally. As we know well, when the government subsidizes something we get more of it. The government provides a myriad of federal welfare benefits to those who come to the US illegally, including food stamps and free medical care. Is this a way to discourage people from coming to the US illegally?

Additionally, one of the most absurd incentives for people to come to the US illegally is the promise of instant US citizenship to anyone born on our soil. That is why when Congress returns next week I will be re-introducing my Constitutional amendment to deny automatic citizenship to individuals born on US soil to parents who are not US citizens or who do not owe permanent allegiance to the United States .

There are many other very troubling items buried deep in the Senate’s immigration compromise. The bill explicitly calls for an “acceleration” of the March 2005 agreement between the US president, the president of Mexico , and the prime minister of Canada , known as the “Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America .” This somewhat secretive agreement – a treaty in all but name – aims to erase the borders between the United States , Canada , and Mexico and threatens our sovereignty and national security. The SPP was agreed by the president without the participation of Congress. It should be eliminated, not accelerated!

According to the pro-Second Amendment Gun Owners of America, the legislation also makes it easier to target gun dealers for prosecution. Even gun clubs could find themselves targeted under this immigration reform legislation.

Immigration reform should start with improving our border protection, yet it was reported last week that the federal government has approved the recruitment of 120 of our best trained Border Patrol agents to go to Iraq to train Iraqis how to better defend their borders! This comes at a time when the National Guard troops participating in Operation Jump Start are being removed from border protection duties in Arizona , New Mexico , and Texas and preparing to deploy to Iraq and Afghanistan ! It is an outrage and it will result in our borders being more vulnerable to illegal entry, including by terrorists.

I will continue to oppose any immigration bill that grants amnesty to illegals or undermines our liberty and sovereignty.

Read More...

Ron Paul on the Dennis Miller Show

1 comments

Here is an audio recording of Ron Paul on the Dennis Miller Show on May 30, 2007. During the interview, they discuss abortion, eminent domain, and the Iraq war.

Dennis says that he agrees with Dr. Paul on most of the issues except for the war. On that subject Dennis holds the arcane and debunked neo-con view that "we have to kill them or they will kill us." Which is simmilar to the line of blarney used by war-mongers during the Vietnam war.

Read More...

Shrouding all the ground me, is this holy crow above me...

0 comments

Its black as holes within a memory
Blue as our new second sun
I stick my hand into the shadow
To pull the pieces from the sand
Which I attempt to re-assemble
To see just who I might have been

But I do not recognize the vessel
Though the eyes seem so familiar
Like phosphorescent desert buttons
singing one familiar song...





...A child's rhyme stuck in my head
it said that life is but a dream
i've spent so many years in question
to find i've known this all along...

Read More...

Image of the Day

0 comments

Read More...

Hundreds boo former Bush chief of staff at University of Massachusetts commencement ceremony

0 comments

Adam Doster | Raw Story
Sunday May 27, 2007

In video, booing is at 1:52 remaining in the video


Andrew Card, President George W. Bush's former Chief of Staff, was showered with a chorus of boos and catcalls from students and faculty of the University of Massachusetts while receiving an honorary degree Friday. Protesters, who caught the embarrassing scene on video, attached anti-Card signs to their robes and drowned out Provost Charlena Seymour's remarks about Card's "public service." Even faculty sitting on stage joined in on the action, screaming their disapproval while holding signs that read "Card: No Honor, No Degree."

Card, obviously shaken by the commotion, managed a slight grin while Seymour spoke. He later raised his hand in recognition but sat down without speaking at any length.

After the ceremony, he refused to acknowledge the protests, only saying, "It was a great honor and a privilege to be here."

The university community was upset with the school's decision to award Card an honorary degree, given his involvement in spinning intelligence in the lead up to the war in Iraq. Even before the ceremony began, 100 faculty members and students sang anti-war songs, handed out leaflets and waved signs outside the arena where commencement was held.

A graduate of the University of South Carolina, Card was a supporter of UMass in his days as a Massachusetts lawmaker. He served as Bush's chief of staff from the president's first inauguration through 2006.

The video was created by the protesters.

Read More...

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

No jobs for US citizens without Homeland Security approval

0 comments

Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse here in the united States of America, the government makes a move to show that it can get far worse. In a dastardly move, the U.S. Senate passed an "immigration reform" bill that will require all Americans to gain "approval" from the Department of Homeland Security in order to work.

This means that the government and DHS are now vested with the power to decide who does or doesn't work in this nation!


source: pressesc.com

US citizens who apply for a job will need prior approval from Department of Homeland Security under the terms immigration bill passed by the Senate this week.

American Civil Liberties Union pointed out that the DHS's Employment Eligibility Verification System (EEVS) is error plagued and if the department makes a mistake in determining work eligibility, there will be virtually no way to challenge the error or recover lost wages due to the bill’s prohibitions on judicial review.

Even current employees will need to obtain eligibility approval from the DHS Within 60 days of the Immigration Reform Act of 2006 becoming law.

"EEVS would be a financial and bureaucratic nightmare for both businesses and workers," said Timothy Sparapani, ACLU Legislative Counsel. "Under this already flawed program no one would be able to work in the U.S. without DHS approval - creating a ‘No Work List’ similar to the government’s ‘No Fly List.’ We need immigration reform, but not at this cost."

The act allocates US$400 million for the implementation of the EEVS, but the Congressional Budgeting Office estimates the system to cost in excess of a billion dollars.

Read More...

Giuliani Confronted By 9/11 Truthers, Lies About WTC Collapse

0 comments

Former New York Mayor flip-flops for third time on foreknowledge of tower's implosion

Paul Joseph Watson | Prison Planet
Tuesday, May 29, 2007

9/11 truthers are making headlines again today after confronting Rudy Giuliani in New York on his foreknowledge of the collapse of the twin towers. Amazingly, just weeks after saying the opposite, Giuliani now claims he had no idea the towers were going to fall.



Although 1 in 3 Americans believe in a 9/11 cover-up, they continue to refer to concerned citizens as "radicals" while war mongering demagogues like Giuliani are alright.

Here's the media "spin" that resulted from the encounter.

"A radical group at a Bronx fundraiser confronted Rudolph Giuliani on Tuesday morning, accusing him of being one of the "criminals of 9/11," reports WNBC.

"The Republican nominee for president was outside City Island's Sea Shore restaurant in the Bronx, speaking with WNBC.com's Adam Shapiro about his fundraising in New York."

"Afterward, a young woman claiming to be the relative of a Sept. 11, 2001, firefighter who died when the towers collapsed, asked Giuliani why he allegedly told Peter Jennings the towers would not fall that day, but did not stop the rescue efforts of firefighters and police officers."

"The woman claims Giuliani knew the towers would fall, and allowed rescuers to go to their deaths. She asked him, "How do you sleep at night?"

"Giuliani was extremely polite, telling the young woman she was wrong and that he never said what she claimed. At that point, another protester from her group, a young man, interrupted Giuliani with the same allegations."

"Giuliani replied by saying, "I didn't realize the towers would collapse." He later added, "No one that I know of had any idea they would implode. That was a complete surprise."


Giuliani was confronted by Infowars reporters led by 9/11 truth movement warrior Luke Rudkowski, head of the WeAreChange.org group, and the story has since garnered national attention, appearing on the Drudge Report early this afternoon.

In claiming that he had no idea that the towers would collapse, Giuliani has now flip-flopped on this issue for a third time.

"We were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse," Giuliani told ABC's Peter Jennings during a phone interview on 9/11. Giuliani has never identified the source of this warning, unprecedented as it is that modern steel framed buildings would collapse from fire damage for the first time in history, and it completely contradicts his assertion today that he "didn't realize the towers would collapse."


The ABC clip is included in the video below.



In addition, during an April 19th event held at the Oklahoma City Museum and National Memorial, Giuliani said "It occurred to us all that they might ultimately collapse," in referring to the twin towers.

He was also caught in a bizarre lie when he claimed that WTC 7 collapsed in stages over a period of time when in reality it fell within just eight seconds.



Though Giuliani is attempting to make a distinction of the fact that he expected the towers to fall after a period of time, this still doesn't explain who gave him the warning and why he seems to flip-flop on this issue every time he is asked about it, while wearing a strange broad grin across his face.

it also underscores the notion that the sudden implosion of the twin towers was an unnatural event and even Giuliani acknowledges this fact.

The 9/11 truth activists led by Rudowski also confronted David Rockefeller at his home as well as the CFR at their main headquarters. Reports and video footage on those events will be forthcoming.

Read More...

Watching fate as it flows down the path we have chosen

0 comments

This is an interesting music video from Nine Inch Nails titled "We're in This Together."


I've become impossible
Holding on to when
When everything seemed to matter more
The two of us
All used and beaten up
Watching fate as it flows down the path we have chose

You and me
Were in this together now
None of them can stop us now
We will make it through somehow
You and me
If the world should break in two
Until the very end of me
Until the very end of you

Awake to the sound as they peel apart the skin
They pick and they pull
Trying to get their fingers in
Well they've got to kill what we found
Well they've got to hate what they fear
Well they've got to make it go away
Well they've got to make it disappear

The farther I fall I'm beside you
As lost as I get I will find you
The deeper the wound I'm inside you
For ever and ever I am a part of

You and me
Were in this together now
None of them can stop us now
We will make it through some how
You and me
If the world should break in two
Until the very end of me
Until the very end of you

All that we were is gone we have to hold on
When all our hope is gone we have to hold on
All that we were is gone but we can hold on

You and me
Were in this together now
None of them can stop us now
We will make it through somehow
You and me

Even after everything
You're the queen and I'm the king
Nothing else means anything

Read More...

Monday, May 28, 2007

A Tribute to Communism

0 comments

Although the greatest mass murderers in human history were done by Communist regimes, Communism is still glorified as the alternative to Capitalism. This video is a tribute to the real blood curdling legacy of the communist regimes.

Read More...

Animal protein (meat and dairy) causes cancer

0 comments

The Standard American Diet (SAD) has an excessive level of animal protein in it and a major lack of whole plant-based foods. Experimental evidence taken from studies conducted worldwide indicate that cultures which consume primarily animal-based foods are far more likely to develop cancer than cultures which consume primarily plant-based foods.

In the video, Professor T. Colin Campbell (PhD) shares his data and observations, from his observations over decades of studying the effects of proteins and other dietary factors on health.

Dr. Campbell was once a staunch advocate for the consumption of animal protein, but the data that he encountered is clear and undeniable.


Read More...

Sunday, May 27, 2007

DynCorp & Haliburton Sex Slave Trade Scandal

0 comments

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones | January 1 2006

Almost a year after Representative Cynthia McKinney was told by Donald Rumsfeld that it was not the policy of the Bush administration to reward companies that engage in human trafficking with government contracts, the scandal continues to sweep up innocent children who are sold into a life of slavery at the behest of Halliburton subsidiaries , Dyncorp and other transnational corporations with close ties to the establishment elite.

On March 11th 2005, McKinney grilled Secretary Rumsfeld and General Myers on the Dyncorp scandal.

“Mr. Secretary, I watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in September 2003, in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade. The President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible business. But at the very moment of that speech, DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children. While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy of the U.S. Government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?”

The response and McKinney’s comeback was as follows.

Rumsfeld: “Thank you, Representative. First, the answer to your first question is, is, no, absolutely not, the policy of the United States Government is clear, unambiguous, and opposed to the activities that you described. The second question.”

McKinney: “Well how do you explain the fact that DynCorp and its successor companies have received and continue to receive government contracts?”

Rumsfeld: “I would have to go and find the facts, but there are laws and rules and regulations with respect to government contracts, and there are times that corporations do things they should not do, in which case they tend to be suspended for some period; there are times then that the - under the laws and the rules and regulations for the - passed by the Congress and implemented by the Executive branch - that corporations can get off of - out of the penalty box if you will, and be permitted to engage in contracts with the government. They’re generally not barred in perpetuity.”

McKinney: “This contract - this company - was never in the penalty box.”

Rumsfeld: “I’m advised by DR. Chu that it was not the corporation that was engaged in the activities you characterized but I’m told it was an employee of the corporation, and it was some years ago in the Balkans that that took place.”



Rumsfeld’s effort to shift the blame away from the hierarchy at Dyncorp and onto the Dyncorp employees was a blatant attempt to hide the fact that human trafficking and sex slavery is a practice condoned by companies like Dyncorp and Halliburton subsidiaries like KBR.

What else are we to assume in light of recent revelations cited in the Chicago Tribune that Halliburton subsidiary KBR and Dyncorp lobbyists are working in tandem with the Pentagon to stall legislation that would specifically ban trafficking in humans for forced labor and prostitution by U.S. contractors?

Three years has now elapsed since President Bush’s promise to bring an end to this disgrace and the Pentagon is still yet to actually bar the practice.

And the employees themselves that are burned for blowing the whistle, like Kathryn Bolkovac who was sacked for reporting on Dyncorp officials who were involved in the Bosnian sex trade.

Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich is one of very few representatives in high office aside from Cynthia McKinney to demand answers on this issue.

We applaud Blagojevich’s eforts. The iron curtain of official denial and soft-peddling is falling down.

What has happened to the children who were sold into slavery and forced to satisfy the demands of sick pedophiles working on behalf of the US government?

Where were the investigations and convictions in other cases of establishment orchestrated child slavery and prostitution? Like the NATO officials responsible for the mushrooming of child prostitution in Kosovo?

What happened to UN officials identified as using a ship charted for ‘peacekeepers’ to bring young girls from Thailand to East Timor as prostitutes?

In addition, we received an E mail from a person claiming to be a Dyncorp employee stating that a high level Dyncorp official is breaking the law by accepting payment from the US government and in turn the American taxpayer by falsifying timesheets and claiming pay for hours not worked.

The contact states that this was repeatedly brought to the attention of DynCorp program managers by Dyncorp employees but they were told it was “none of their business.”

It is important to stress that at the moment these are allegations and we have no proof of this other than the validity of the e mail.

The e mail is a reminder that we should always consider the fact that the vast majority of Dyncorp employees are just doing their jobs and have nothing to do with this scandal. It is a small faction at the head of the hydra that have authorized and engaged in these horrors.

We have a government that says it doesn’t advocate torture and yet tries to block a law that would end torture. We have a government that repeatedly burns lower level minions to wash its hands of every major scandal that encompasses policies directly administered by the government itself, as in the case of Abu Ghraib and the Dyncorp sex scandal.

A government that covers-up for those who force children into prostitution and slavery is a clear danger to our very way of life. We must demand answers and finally put an end to a process that exploits and wreaks terror on the lives of the most innocent and vulnerable members of society, whether they be in the Balkans, East Timor or here at home.

Our own children.

Read More...

Caution: Some soft drinks may seriously harm your health

0 comments

Expert links additive to cell damage

Martin Hickman | independent.co.uk
Published: 27 May 2007

A new health scare erupted over soft drinks last night amid evidence they may cause serious cell damage. Research from a British university suggests a common preservative found in drinks such as Fanta and Pepsi Max has the ability to switch off vital parts of DNA.

The problem - more usually associated with ageing and alcohol abuse - can eventually lead to cirrhosis of the liver and degenerative diseases such as Parkinson's.

The findings could have serious consequences for the hundreds of millions of people worldwide who consume fizzy drinks. They will also intensify the controversy about food additives, which have been linked to hyperactivity in children.

Concerns centre on the safety of E211, known as sodium benzoate, a preservative used for decades by the £74bn global carbonated drinks industry. Sodium benzoate derives from benzoic acid. It occurs naturally in berries, but is used in large quantities to prevent mould in soft drinks such as Sprite, Oasis and Dr Pepper. It is also added to pickles and sauces.

Sodium benzoate has already been the subject of concern about cancer because when mixed with the additive vitamin C in soft drinks, it causes benzene, a carcinogenic substance. A Food Standards Agency survey of benzene in drinks last year found high levels in four brands which were removed from sale.

Now, an expert in ageing at Sheffield University, who has been working on sodium benzoate since publishing a research paper in 1999, has decided to speak out about another danger. Professor Peter Piper, a professor of molecular biology and biotechnology, tested the impact of sodium benzoate on living yeast cells in his laboratory. What he found alarmed him: the benzoate was damaging an important area of DNA in the "power station" of cells known as the mitochondria.

He told The Independent on Sunday: "These chemicals have the ability to cause severe damage to DNA in the mitochondria to the point that they totally inactivate it: they knock it out altogether.

"The mitochondria consumes the oxygen to give you energy and if you damage it - as happens in a number if diseased states - then the cell starts to malfunction very seriously. And there is a whole array of diseases that are now being tied to damage to this DNA - Parkinson's and quite a lot of neuro-degenerative diseases, but above all the whole process of ageing."

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) backs the use of sodium benzoate in the UK and it has been approved by the European Union but last night, MPs called for it to investigate urgently.

Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat chair of Parliament's all-party environment group said: "Many additives are relatively new and their long-term impact cannot be certain. This preservative clearly needs to be investigated further by the FSA."

A review of sodium benzoate by the World Health Organisation in 2000 concluded that it was safe, but it noted that the available science supporting its safety was "limited".

Professor Piper, whose work has been funded by a government research council, said tests conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration were out of date.

"The food industry will say these compounds have been tested and they are complete safe," he said. "By the criteria of modern safety testing, the safety tests were inadequate. Like all things, safety testing moves forward and you can conduct a much more rigorous safety test than you could 50 years ago."

He advised parents to think carefully about buying drinks with preservatives until the quantities in products were proved safe by new tests. "My concern is for children who are drinking large amounts," he said.

Coca-Cola and Britvic's Pepsi Max and Diet Pepsi all contain sodium benzoate. Their makers and the British Soft Drinks Association said they entrusted the safety of additives to the Government.

Read More...

Saturday, May 26, 2007

Heavy Heated Ron Paul Debate on CNN's Paula Zahn Now

0 comments

This debate goes to show you how brainwashed many American's are. How on earth did this guy "Ben" get on this panel? He has ZERO knowledge on the middle east. He states 100% opinion yet he is asked to debate real life issues. Come on CNN, do better than this!


Read More...

Ron Paul Appears on Bill Maher Again

0 comments

Trevor Perry | The T.R.U.T.H. Project


Whether it’s in front of his Republican base or a left of center audience like Real Time With Bill Maher, Ron Paul is getting accustomed to warm greetings and a rowdy applause every occasion he is allowed to speak. Dr. Paul whistled a familiar tune when he reiterated his beliefs on foreign policy and the state of the Republican Party, as well as a prediction that Rudy “I survived 9/11 and got rich off of it, how you like me now?” Giuliani would apologize as long as he did the homework prescribed by the Doctor.


After a cynical first encounter with the Bill Maher in late March, the TV host had a chance to catch Dr. Paul in action during the first Presidential Debate at the Reagan Library. Paul’s shining performance and brief encounter with Giuliani changed Maher’s attitude the second time around, referring to Ron Paul as his hero and giving him almost eight minutes of airtime on tonight’s broadcast. Our next President received no rebuttal as he asserted a message of peace and non-intervention.

Paul again referred to the potential of ‘blowback’ from operations carried out by criminal elements cloaked in the name of the United States, such as the overthrowing of Mohammad Mossadeq, the pro-American, democratically elected leader of Iran, in 1953. He rebutted theattack against him in the federal media which attempted to spin his words into a belief that American’s had caused or possibly even deserved the attack, by making it clear that foreign policy was to blame.

Ron Paul made a reference to hypocrisy in the Neo-Republican Party, saying they only speak about small government and classical conservative values, while executing an almost imperialistic foreign policy. Referring to himself as the peace candidate, Dr. Paul stated that only by example could the neo-con mantra of spreading democracy be effectively carried out.

Although he could have taken it one step further by saying what the empirical evidence clearly shows, that his party is being destroyed by design, Ron Paul plays ball and merely says it has lost it’s way, when questioned, ‘what has happened to the Republicans?’ by Maher. A wise strategy on the part of the doctor, stating the truth while still working within the paradigm of a sleepy nation.

A pile of support on either end of the political spectrum is a boost of hope in the effort to defeat whatever figurehead is chosen by the multinational goon-squad, aka the New World Order.

Read More...

Friday, May 25, 2007

Giuliani Hates National Sovreignty, the Bill of Rights and the Founders of America

0 comments

Since 1980, "Ghouliani" has been a proponent of gun control. As mayor of New York City, he had the city sue gun manufacturers for "making too many guns." He believes that guns are only to be used for "hunting and law enforcement," which indicates that he is ignorant of the advice of the founders, or he just doesn't care about Constitutional values.

He also harbors the bizarre belief that gun confiscation leads to a decrease in crime. This is bizarre because history shows that the OPPOSITE is actually true. When guns are illegal all manner of crime increase dramatically, as is evidenced in Australia's recent gun grab.



One of Giuliani's many conflicts of interest is his law firm, Bracewell & Giuliani, which represents globalist interests intent upon merging the united States of America with Mexico and Canada as the North American Union.

Giuliani Linked to "NAFTA Superhighway"
May 14, 2007

By Cliff Kincaid | Accuracy In Media

Brit Hume said on the Fox News Sunday program that it is possible that Republican frontrunner Rudy Giuliani could overcome his convoluted posturing on abortion and secure the Republican presidential nomination in 2008. But Giuliani has some other major problems. These include foreign clients, one of whom is constructing part of the "NAFTA Superhighway" project that has people in Texas and around the nation up in arms.

Hume, the moderator of Tuesday night's Republican presidential debate in South Carolina, will be in a position to ask Giuliani about it. Questions will also be posed by Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace and White House correspondent Wendell Goler.

Evidence shows that NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement involving the U.S., Canada and Mexico, is being expanded without congressional approval or oversight as part of a plan to create an economic and political entity known as the North American Union (NAU). Federal documents uncovered by Judicial Watch quote participants in the scheme as saying that an "evolution by stealth" strategy is being used to put the pieces into place. Documents also speak of developing a common security perimeter and a common identification card for citizens of the three countries.

With the exception of Lou Dobbs of CNN, our national media have ignored not only the process that is well underway but the growing outcry over what is happening. Resolutions against the NAU have been introduced in 14 state legislatures-and have passed in two-and thousands of people have turned out in Texas to protest a Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) highway system, which will link the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Critics say the project is being funded by foreign interests, could run roughshod over private property rights, and could facilitate illegal activities, such as the trafficking of people and drugs, from Mexico.

The TTC, which is viewed as being part of the "NAFTA Superhighway," is only part of a much larger process of integrating the three nations. This writer attended and covered a February 16, 2007, conference sponsored by the Center for North American Studies at American University (AU) that was devoted to an emerging "North American Community," which is what conference organizer Robert Pastor, a former Carter Administration official, prefers to call it. Academic literature distributed to conference participants discussed a common legal framework for the U.S., Canada and Mexico and proposals for a North American Court of Justice (with the authority to overrule a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court), a North American Trade Tribunal, and a Charter of Fundamental Human Rights for North America. One of Pastor's students at AU suggests that he even favors a North American Parliament.

The conference organizers and participants believe NAFTA, which promised economic integration, has to be expanded into the legal, social, political and even cultural areas. Pastor, though a Democrat, succeeded in persuading Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn to introduce a "North American Investment Fund" bill to send more U.S. tax dollars to Mexico. Both political parties are seen favoring the process of bringing the three countries together into an entity like the European Union that now governs Europe and supersedes the sovereignty of member governments.

One obvious problem is corruption in and illegal immigration from Mexico. Public sentiment in the U.S. forced Congress to pass-and President Bush to sign-a law creating a fence on the U.S. southern border. Nevertheless, Bush and the Democrats continue to press for amnesty for illegal aliens and ways to increase the flow of foreign workers into the U.S.

The Giuliani connection to this controversial process is through Bracewell & Giuliani, a law firm he joined as senior partner in 2005. Bracewell has already come in for criticism because it represents Citgo, the oil company controlled by Venezuela's anti-American and terrorist-supporting ruler Hugo Chavez.

Freelance columnist Dianne M. Grassi broke the story of Giuliani's law firm acting as the exclusive legal counsel for Cintra, the Spanish firm that has been granted the right to operate a toll road in the Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) project. Grassi comments, "Most interesting to the whole story is not only has Mr. Giuliani's involvement in the NAFTA Superhighway not ever having been publicly addressed, but how a foreign company is awarded the building of a mass highway system, versus maintaining it, for the first time in U.S. history, and negotiated by the law firm of the top Republican candidate running for President of the United States. And truly disturbing is how such will not only have national and homeland security and sovereignty implications but how it is deliberately being kept away from the Halls of Congress."

Grassi's revelations are easily confirmed by checking the websites of Bracewell and Cintra. Bracewell calls the deal "the first privatization of a Texas toll road."

Terri Hall, founder and director of Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom (TURF), notes that Giuliani clients with an interest in acquiring Texas roads and infrastructure have also invested in his presidential campaign. She comments, "This could explain why Giuliani has spent so much time fundraising in Texas. The monied proponents of the Trans-Texas Corridor, of which there are many, would like to see this man become President."

Ironically, Ryan Sager of the New York Sun reports that Giuliani, before he became a private businessman with global clients, opposed NAFTA

It turns out that Cintra is a financial partner with an Australian company, Macquarie, on a toll-road project in Indiana, and that Macquarie acquired the business and assets of an investment bank known as Giuliani Capital Advisors.

Sunday's Washington Post notes that Giuliani Capital Advisors "was sold for an undisclosed amount as Giuliani was preparing his run for president."

The Post article also discloses that Giuliani's secretive lobbying firm, Giuliani Partners, has made more than $100 million over the last five years and that its clients "are required to sign confidentiality agreements, so they do not comment about the work they receive or how much they are paying for it. Though now running for president, Giuliani refuses to identify his clients, disclose his compensation or reveal any details about Giuliani Partners. He also declined to be interviewed about the firm." The paper provided some details, based "on a review of corporate, government and court records, along with scores of interviews with clients and government officials who have interacted with Giuliani Partners."

Many questions remain about Giuliani's controversial work for foreign interests. But his connection to the Trans-Texas Corridor is already a matter of public record and cries out for scrutiny. Will Fox News personalities ask him about it on Tuesday night?

Read More...

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Ron Paul to be on the Daily Show

0 comments

FreeMarketNews.com
May 23, 2007

Presidential candidate, Congressman Dr. Ron Paul (R-TX) continues to be a "hot ticket" on nightly newscasts. On Friday, May 25, he is appearing on the Bill Maher program, "Real Time" and sources say that he may also appear on Comedy Central's The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, and maybe The Colbert Report as well.

"The Daily Show seems to be wrapped up," said one source close to the campaign. "They just have to pick a date. Colbert may be happening as well."

The programs, on Comedy Central, have proven most popular in the last few years, spawning a kind of new media genre, "comedy news." The hosts deal with newsworthy topics of interest, and even interview serious newsmakers, but do so in a way that makes light of the news content, treating some or much of it "for laughs."

The programs score especially well with young people. Some polls even seem to indicate that adolescents and young adults receive more information about news and current events from such shows than from more serious venues.

The Daily Show describes itself as follows:

One anchor, five correspondents, zero credibility.

If you're tired of the stodginess of the evening newscasts, if you can't bear to sit through the spinmeisters and shills on the 24-hour cable news networks, don't miss The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, a nightly half-hour series unburdened by objectivity, journalistic integrity or even accuracy.

The Emmy and Peabody Award-winning Daily Show takes a reality-based look at news, trends, pop culture, current events, politics, sports and entertainment with an alternative point of view. In each show anchorman Jon Stewart and a team of correspondents, including Dan Bakkedahl, John Oliver, Rob Riggle, Jason Jones and Samantha Bee and Lewis Black, comment on the day's stories, employing actual news footage, taped field pieces, in-studio guests and on-the-spot coverage of important news events.

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart - it's even better than being informed.

Read More...

Ron Paul: The Smarter Politician

0 comments

PoliticalInquirer.com

When looking at recent actions of the Republican hopefuls, one really has to wonder what is going through their heads, whether it be theirs or their campaign staff. John McCain has made somewhat of a rebound, but he sank quite a bit in the polls after placing number two to Guiliani, undeclared name Fred Thompson was even ahead of him at one point in some polls. Is there any mystery to this? John McCain is the John Kerry of the Republican’s this year. I don’t even want to get in to his flops, but one thing is for certain with him, he will follow the Bush foreign policy to the very end. McCain and about 20% of the population, not much of a base to get elected president.

Then there is current front runner Rudy Guiliani, who is only on stage because he happened to be mayor during a terrorist attack, making him the perfect candidate of the security party…I mean the Republican’s, putting aside the fact that they haven’t made us safer yet. Then there is his stances on abortion and gun rights, which go against the basic beliefs of the party itself. Recently, the leader of Focus on the Family, a conservative group, said he would sit out the election if Guiliani was picked. Oh, and he also said he wouldn’t vote for McCain either. Conservative leaders are turning away from the Republican presidential candidates.

The best way for lesser candidates to get noticed, is to take on one of the frontrunners on the issues, and that is just what Ron Paul did during, and after, the foxnews debate in South Carolina with Rudy Guiliani. Paul spoke the truth about the harmful aftertaste of our interventionist policies, which got the scrutiny of Guiliani. He gained the initial applause of the South Carolina audience, but since then, Paul has stayed on the attack.

Conservative media kept the pressure up on Paul, mostly Sean Hannity who was doing coverage of the fox debate. Multiple people told Paul to back out from his foreign policy assumptions because they were “un-American.” Paul responded directly to this topic on a CNN interview, where he turned the tables, and said:

“No, there’s no reason too, I think he’s going to need to back away from his statements pretty soon, because I found two very clear quotes in the 9-11 commission report that says that very thing, that our foreign policy that has a very great deal to do with their willingness and desire to commit suicide terrorism, so I suggest he read the 9-11 commission report.”

The Ron Paul campaign also put out a youtube video specifically titled “Educating Rudy“, which shows Paul discussing a variety of issues, including foreign policy. We sacrifice quite a lot in return for security from terrorism. Then, it is said we should go over to the Middle East to fight them there, so that they don’t come here. Paul responds to this idea by saying:

“I find great fallacy in that logic. They came over here, because we were over there.”

Which leads us to a cycle. We give them more reasons to attack us, and their attacks give us more reason to give up our freedom, and go to war, spending billions of dollars that we can’t afford. We borrow to pay for our Iraq operations, and now here is the Bush administration, on the doorstep of Iran, foaming at the mouth.

When Ron Paul and his campaign say he is the only real conservative in the race, it isn’t a biased opinion, he really IS the only one. This scares the post-9/11 Republican’s, and this might be the reason why Rudy picked Paul as a target. That, and he finds the need to bring up the attack as much as possible to gain support. Paul is pro-life, with no flip flop on it, he has never voted for higher taxes or bigger government. Post-9/11 Republican’s like big government these days, big bureaucracies to defend us (the department of homeland security).

Paul was not done there. He went further, giving Giuliani a reading assignment on American foreign policy, books that support Paul’s views. He said:

“I don’t think he’s qualified to be president. If he was to read the book and report back to me and say, ‘I’ve changed my mind,’ I would reconsider.”

Paul has already stated he would not support Guiliani for president in the CNN interview, unless his foreign policy views were to change. Paul has suggested Giuliani read the 9-11 commission report, along with books “Dying to Win” and “Blowback”. The goal of foreign policy is to help a nation, not to hurt it.

Unlike other Republican’s, Paul understands this cycle is hurting us, and the Republican’s will continue this cycle, unless there is a change, and he is that change, because none of the other candidates will do it. Soon, the numbers against the Iraq war will be nearing eighty percent, and the “Republicans” keep pushing the Iraq operations…and they expect to win?

Read More...

The Natural Way to Break Your Smoking Habit

0 comments

In the first study to explore the effects of food and beverages on the taste of cigarettes, 209 smokers were asked to name items that worsen or enhance cigarettes' taste.

Smokers reported that drinking milk or water, or eating fruits and vegetables, worsened the taste of cigarettes. On the other hand, alcohol, coffee and meat enhanced the taste of cigarettes. These findings could lead to a diet that makes it easier to quit smoking.

Nineteen percent of the smokers said that dairy products worsen the taste of cigarettes, 16 percent said that fruits and vegetables did so, and 14 percent reported the same effect for water and juice. Alcohol enhanced the taste for 44 percent, while 45 percent said the same of caffeinated beverages and 11 percent found the taste was enhanced after eating meat.

Smokers of menthol cigarettes were less likely to say that foods or beverages altered the taste of their cigarettes.

Silver acetate is known to alter the taste of cigarettes, and it has been suggested that it could be used in the form of a gum or a lozenge as part of a treatment to help smokers quit.

Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, April 2007: 505-510
Science Blog April 4, 2007




Dr. Mercola's Comment:

This could be a safer, non-drug approach to stop smoking: consuming a diet richer in fruits, vegetables, water and dairy products. Not only is such a diet better for your health all around, but it will also help your body to more rapidly recover from the damage that smoking is doing to you.

On the other hand, I'm not surprised to learn consuming alcohol and caffeinated beverages such as soft drinks topped the list of foods that enhanced the taste of cigarettes.

Unhealthy habits lead to more unhealthy habits, apparently. When you engage in disease-promoting behaviors they tend to synergize with other unhealthy behaviors so it actually makes the problem much worse.

Fortunately, the converse of this equation is also true. If you improve your health habits they will syngerize to acclerate your journey toward health.

There are also other reasons why it's a good idea to improve your diet when you want to kick the cigarette habit. If you fail to do this, you actually risk making your health worse. I helped my sister stop smoking over 20 years ago and did not understand this fact -- she gained over 100 pounds and still has yet to lose any of it. So even though she has not smoked for 20 years, she has had the challenge of insulin resistance for those 20 years, which has seriously damaged her health.

However, considering all the harm that smoking can do to your health and the health of those you love, your best option remains to quit cold turkey. Doing anything less does almost nothing to reduce your cancer risks.

One of the more effective ways to stop smoking once and for all is to learn the Emotional Freedom Technique, the energy psychology tool used daily in my practice.

Read More...

Chinese Stock Market Continues Rise

0 comments

Oxford Analytica 05.18.07, 6:00 AM ET

The Shanghai Composite Index has surged to above 4,000, closing at 4,048.29 today.

Price movements are being driven by speculative sentiment as to whether liquidity will continue entering the market, thus facilitating further capital gains. This raises serious questions about the sustainability of this year's stock market surge and the implications of a downturn.

After rising by 130% last year, the Shanghai Composite Index has risen a further 50% this year. Prices in Shanghai and Shenzhen are now trading at close to 50 times 2006 earnings, compared with 16 times in Hong Kong. Stronger than expected earnings growth reduces prices to around 35 times 2007 earnings, but this still leaves the market looking decidedly overvalued. Morgan Stanley's MSCI China index, which tracks Chinese firms listed overseas, has a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of around 16 times.

The deterioration in fundamental value has already led some institutional investors, notably the National Social Security Fund, to trim their exposure, but interest from retail investors has remained strong. Last month alone, a total of 4.79 million new share-trading accounts were opened, nearly 1 million more than the combined total for the previous two years.

The rising market can be attributed to four demand- and supply-side factors:

  • Former nontradeable share categories have been abolished, but the newly converted tradeable shares are subject to lock-up periods that will remain in force this year. Accordingly, only around 40% of total shares are available for trading.
  • Many large Chinese companies continue to maintain a sole listing overseas, usually in Hong Kong.
  • The steady stream of high-profile initial public offerings in the domestic markets has continued.
  • Liquidity continues to enter the markets.


The authorities have implemented changes aimed at cooling the markets, although the overall policy stance remains moderate. In March, for the third time in a year, the People's Bank of China raised lending rates, the one-year lending rate now standing at 6.39%. And last month, for the fourth time this year, the People's Bank announced an increase in the reserve requirement for banks, to 11%, effective May 15.

There are other policy options. A more flexible exchange rate could be adopted. However, this is a blunt instrument for the problem at hand, and would only assist in moderating the creation of new liquidity without having any effect on the existing stock.

A capital gains tax could be introduced. Rumors that such a tax was about to be introduced triggered the sharp sell-off in Shanghai on Feb. 27. The Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation quickly squashed these rumors, a response making a policy turnaround unlikely, at least in the short term.

The stock markets have become highly sensitive to events that can have an impact on the volume of liquidity coming in. With no aggressive government policy changes foreseeable in the short term, an expectation that domestic growth will remain strong and external accounts in a large surplus, the scope for further price increases remains. However, any sharp fall would have a dampening effect on investment and consumption, although this might be limited as well as uneven.

Read More...

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

More Evidence of VIDEO FAKERY during the 9/11

0 comments

Until recently, I believed that the Twin Towers were hit by jumbo jets, though I didn't believe that they came down due to the jet fuel.

New analysis is emerging that indicates that video and audio fakery was used on many of the films on 9/11. The videos linked below illustrate this.


Here are all of the videos appearing under "9/11 Video Fakery" on Technorati.

Morgan Reynolds discusses the video fakery involving cartoon airplanes on Fox News. He also talks about how "the two American Airlines flights were not even in the bureau of transportation statistics database."

Here is a clip of a reporter describing his account of the Tower 2 explosion. He says "It was not a jet... it could have been a missile"

Here is some interesting audio evidence in which there is no evidence of a jet plane anywhere near the towers. You can actually hear police sirens and horns, but no sense of any jet engine.

Here is another that shows the SUDDEN appearance of a plane after the shot quickly pans into the towers.

Here is an interview with Jim Fetzer from May 22, 2007 with regard to VIDEO FAKERY. "The existence of a plane hitting the building is not proven... the existence of video fakery is proven."

Read More...

Bush grants presidency extraordinary powers

0 comments

Directive for emergencies apparently gives authority without congressional oversight

WorldNetDaily.com

President Bush has signed a directive granting extraordinary powers to the office of the president in the event of a declared national emergency, apparently without congressional approval or oversight.

The "National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive" was signed May 9, notes Jerome R. Corsi in a WND column.

It was issued with the dual designation of NSPD-51, as a National Security Presidential Directive, and HSPD-20, as a Homeland Security Presidential Directive.

The directive establishes under the office of the president a new national continuity coordinator whose job is to make plans for "National Essential Functions" of all federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments, as well as private sector organizations to continue functioning under the president's directives in the event of a national emergency.

"Catastrophic emergency" is loosely defined as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions."

Corsi says the president can assume the power to direct any and all government and business activities until the emergency is declared over.

The directive says the assistant to the president for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, currently Frances Fragos Townsend, would be designated as the national continuity coordinator.

Corsi says the directive makes no attempt to reconcile the powers created for the national continuity coordinator with the National Emergency Act, which requires that such proclamation "shall immediately be transmitted to the Congress and published in the Federal Register."

A Congressional Research Service study notes the National Emergency Act sets up Congress as a balance empowered to "modify, rescind, or render dormant" such emergency authority if Congress believes the president has acted inappropriately.

But the new directive appears to supersede the National Emergency Act by creating the new position of national continuity coordinator without any specific act of Congress authorizing the position, Corsi says.

The directive also makes no reference to Congress and its language appears to negate any requirement that the president submit to Congress a determination that a national emergency exists.

It suggests instead that the powers of the directive can be implemented without any congressional approval or oversight.

Homeland Security spokesman Russ Knocke affirmed to Corsi the Homeland Security Department would implement the requirements of the order under Townsend's direction.

The White House declined to comment on the directive.

Read More...

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

New Evidence Shows a Plane Did NOT Hit the World Trade Center

0 comments

The video below clearly shows that no plane hit Tower 2, it does this by comparing the news footage of several different stations. NBC Channel 4 shows NO plane flying towards the tower, while WB 11 shows a plane flying in. This indicates the likelihood that the plane was added into the feed for most, though not all, of the news feeds.

Read More...

Path to National Suicide

0 comments

Patrick J. Buchanan
Monday May 21, 2007


“At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected?

“I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.”


So said Abe Lincoln to the Young Men’s Lyceum in Springfield. Observing the Senate last week, and looking over the latest figures from the Census Bureau, America is now risking national suicide.

Last week, senators meeting in secret produced a bill to legalize our 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens. If a path to citizenship becomes law, nothing will stop the next invasion. As President Bush acknowledges, 6 million tried to breach our southern border in his first five years. One in 12 – 500,000 – had a criminal record.

According to the Census Bureau, from mid-2005 to mid-2006, the U.S. minority population rose 2.4 million, to exceed 100 million. Hispanics, 1 percent of the population in 1950, are now 14.4 percent. Their total number has soared 25 percent since 2000 alone. The Asian population has also grown by 25 percent since 2000.

The number of white kids of school age fell 4 percent, however. Half the children 5 and younger in the United States are now minorities.

What is happening to us? An immigrant invasion of the United States from the Third World, as America’s white majority is no longer even reproducing itself. Since Roe v. Wade, America has aborted 45 million of her children. And Asia, Africa and Latin America have sent 45 million of their children to inherit the estate the aborted American children never saw. God is not mocked.

And white America is in flight.

In the 1990s, for the first time since the Spanish came, whites left California. Two million departed. From July 1, 2005, to July 1, 2006, 100,000 more packed up and headed back whence their fathers came. The “Anglo” population of the Golden State is down to 43 percent and falling fast. White folks are now a minority in Texas and New Mexico. In Arizona, Hispanics account for over half the population under 20.

The future is not in doubt. Why ought this be of concern?

First, while the black and Hispanic population combined is now 85 million – five times what it was in 1960 – half of all black and Hispanic kids drop out of high school. And the average math and reading scores of the half who graduate are at seventh-, eighth- or ninth-grade levels.

And the future is not so sanguine as it seemed 50 years ago. As I write in “State of Emergency”:

“In 1960, 18 million black Americans, 10 percent of the nation, were not fully integrated into society, but they had been assimilated into our culture. They worshiped the same God, spoke the same language, had endured the same Depression and war, watched the same TV shows on the same four channels, laughed at the same comedians, went to the same movies, ate the same foods, read the same newspapers and went to schools where, even when segregated, we learned the same history and literature and shared the same holidays: Christmas, New Year’s, Washington’s Birthday, Easter, Memorial Day, July 4, Labor Day, Columbus Day. Segregation existed, but black folks were as American as apple pie, having lived in this land longer than almost every other group save the Native Americans.

“That cultural unity, that sense that we were one people, is gone.”

Today’s immigrants exceed in number anything any nation has ever known. They now come from cultures and countries whose people have never before been assimilated by any First World country. Not only is the Melting Pot broken, it is rejected by our elites. Minorities are urged to hold onto their own language, customs, traditions. Identity politics is in. And the largest cohort, Mexicans, comes from a country with a historic grievance and a claim on the territory they are entering.

Moreover, since the cultural revolution of the 1960s, we have been fighting one another over issues of race and ethnicity, history, heroes and holidays, morality and religion, right and wrong.

All over the Western world, multiethnic, multicultural countries are coming apart over language, ethnicity, history. The Soviet Union broke into 15 nations, Yugoslavia into half a dozen. Czechs and Slovaks divorced. Scots want separation from England. Catalans and Basques seek independence. Corsicans and Bretons want out of France. Northern Italians want to secede. Only immigrants who prefer Ottawa prevent Quebecois from breaking free of Canada.

As we see from the election battles in Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador and Mexico, race and ethnicity are not receding as issues, but rising. In South Central Los Angeles, black and Hispanic gangs are at war over race and turf.

Addressing the Knights of Columbus in 1915, Theodore Roosevelt warned, “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.”

In every way possible, Americans have said they do not want to take this risk with their country. Why, then, are our elites taking it?

Read More...

Pollsters Censoring Ron Paul from the States He Would Do Well In; Statistical Analysis

0 comments

Pollsters Censoring Ron Paul from the States He Would Do Well In; Statistical Analysis

usaelectionpolls.com
Sunday May 20, 2007

There have been 27 republican primary polls taken this calendar year WITHOUT referencing Ron Paul. And only 5 polls with Ron Paul. Here are the results in these polls.

All State Polls from 1/1/2007 w/o Ron Paul
Giuliani 27.8
McCain 22.7
Romney 6.9
F. Thompson 9.3
Ron Paul ---

All State Polls from 1/1/2007 w/ Ron Paul
Giuliani 26.0
McCain 20.5
Romney 8.0
F. Thompson 9.0
Ron Paul 1.0

It may look like Giuliani and McCain lose support with Ron Paul in the poll but because there are only 5 out of 32 state polls with Ron Paul mentioned, the small sample size kind of screws the results.

Ron Paul Excluded From Home State. But what we find here is appauling. Ron Paul only averages 1.0% in the state polls. But that is not the true story because the states that Ron Paul would do well in like Texas never have polls citing him. It is like the media does not want to report any successful Ron Paul stories. Because if there was no worries to them, then they would poll Ron Paul from Texas where he is from. That is just our personal take from the analysis of all these polls.

Candidates With Less Money And Little Support Are Included. Ron Paul is currently 4th among Republicans in fund raising so if he is not mentioned in 27 state polls why are all the other candidates who get less money and have very little support being included in far many polls?

Other Candidates. Let's take a look at something. Of these 32 states polls, how many times are the following candidates mentioned:

  • Newt Gingrich - 26 polls
  • Sam Brownback - 19 polls
  • Tom Tancredo - 19 polls
  • Mike Huckabee - 19 polls
  • Duncan Hunter - 15 polls
  • Tommy Thompson - 13 polls
  • Jim Gilmore - 12 polls
  • Chuck Hagel - 11 polls

Fair? Newt Gingrich makes sense because of his name recognition but he has not even pledged to run yet. 19 polls seems to be a key number because 3 of the other low candidates are included that many times but that represents 4 times as many polls as Ron Paul.

Sources

Read More...

Monday, May 21, 2007

Ron Paul: Stop Dreaming

0 comments

Congressman Paul's consistent voting record prompted one of his congressional colleagues to say, "Ron Paul personifies the Founding Fathers' ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are." Another colleague observed, "There are few people in public life who, through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron Paul is one of those few."


Read More...

Documents: Bush's Grandfather Directed Bank Tied to Man Who Funded Hitler

0 comments

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — President Bush's grandfather was a director of a bank seized by the federal government because of its ties to a German industrialist who helped bankroll Adolf Hitler's rise to power, government documents show.

Prescott Bush was one of seven directors of Union Banking Corp. (search), a New York investment bank owned by a bank controlled by the Thyssen family, according to recently declassified National Archives documents reviewed by The Associated Press.

Fritz Thyssen was an early financial supporter of Hitler, whose Nazi party Thyssen believed was preferable to communism. The documents do not show any evidence Bush directly aided that effort. His position with Union Banking never was a political issue for Bush, who was elected to the Senate from Connecticut in 1952.

Reports of Bush's involvement with the seized bank have been circulating on the Internet for years and have been reported by some mainstream media. The newly declassified documents provide additional details about the Union Banking-Thyssen connection.

Trent Duffy, a spokesman for President Bush, declined to comment.

Union Banking was owned by a Dutch bank, Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaardt N.V., which was "closely affiliated" with the German conglomerate United Steel Works, according to an Oct. 5, 1942, report from the federal Office of Alien Property Custodian. The Dutch bank and the steel firm were part of the business and financial empire of Thyssen and his brother, Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza, the report said.

The 4,000 Union Banking shares owned by the Dutch bank were registered in the names of the seven U.S. directors, according a document signed by Homer Jones, chief of the division of investigation and research of the Office of Alien Property Custodian, a World War II-era agency that no longer exists.

E. Roland Harriman, the bank chairman and brother of former New York Gov. W. Averell Harriman (search), held 3,991 shares. Bush had one share.

Both Harrimans and Bush were partners in the New York investment firm of Brown Brothers, Harriman and Co., which handled the financial transactions of the bank as well as other financial dealings with several other companies linked to Bank voor Handel that were confiscated by the U.S. government during World War II.

Union Banking was seized by the government in October 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act (search).

No charges were brought against Union Banking's American directors. The federal government was too busy trying to fight the war, said Donald Goldstein, a professor of public and international affairs at the University of Pittsburgh.

"We did not have the resources to do these things," Goldstein said.

Fritz Thyssen broke with the Nazis in 1938 over their persecution of Catholics and Jews, and fled to Switzerland. He later was arrested and spent 1941 to 1945 in a Nazi prison. His brother lived in Switzerland from 1932 to 1947 but continued to operate businesses in Germany.

The new documents were first reported by freelance writer John Buchanan in The New Hampshire Gazette.

Read More...

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Taoism Opens the Way

0 comments

China looks to the wisdom of its ancient philosophy to spread the message of harmony

By LI LI | BeijingReview.com

When the founder of China’s Taoist philosophy Lao Zi first began to write Daodejing (Classic of the Way and Virtue), he believed the concept in his mind was too profound to be described in words.

Lao Zi subsequently denied the meaning of writing this classic in its first sentence. “The Tao [way] that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be named is not the eternal name,” reads Daodejing. The short text of about 5,000 characters, while teeming with similar seeming self-contradictions, is the oldest and most important of Taoist works as well as one of the most read books of all time. A total of almost 500 translated versions in 32 languages have been printed, arguably trailing only the Bible in the circulation stakes.

Although Taoists account for only a tiny portion of China’s population, Taoist philosophy, which later evolved into an indigenous Chinese religion called Taoism and visibly influenced the great philosopher Confucius, is deeply rooted in Chinese culture and in the minds of the people. Almost every literate Chinese is familiar with idioms contained in Daodejing, many of which deal with the daily life of the community.

Between April 22 and 26, China Religious Culture Communication Association and Chinese Taoist Association sponsored an international forum on Daodejing in Xi’an of Shaanxi Province and Hong Kong. The event attracted scholars, priests and business leaders from 17 countries all keen to discuss the wisdom contained in the book and how it could be of practical use today. The forum’s theme, “building a harmonious world through the Tao,” was a contemporary adaptation of ancient thought with the current plan of the Chinese Government.

Many speakers at the forum believe Daodejing’s emphasis on the relationship between man and nature is a primitive version of today’s sustainable development concept. While exploring the origin of the universe, the sage Lao Zi, who is often compared to Buddha Sakyamuni or Socrates, introduced the concept of Tao, a larger and united power ruling the sky, the earth, rivers and mountains and an unnamed benevolent force behind the workings of the universe. A core idea in the book is recorded in Chapter 25, “People follow earth, earth follows heaven, heaven follows Tao and Tao follows nature.” And as if sensing what was to come, Lao Zi predicted in Chapter 46 that with greed running wild and without the guidance of Tao, the world is in danger.

Ji Xianlin, a celebrated scholar of traditional Chinese culture, echoed these sentiments when he told the China Religious Culture Communication Association and Chinese Taoist Association forum, “We can learn from Daodejing that nature can never be conquered. People have to develop a friendship with nature and merge with nature.”

From a sociological perspective, Daodejing, essentially anti-war, sees conflict as a deviation from Tao and the resolution of conflict due to the return to Tao. This concept is related to the use of non-action. Chapter 30 of Daodejing says that, “Whoever advises a ruler according to Tao opposes conquest by war. Policies of war tend to rebound. Where the armies march, brambles grow. Whenever a great army is formed, hunger and evil follow.”

If seen as a religion, Taoism is certainly one of the world’s most tolerant. Ho Chi Ping, Hong Kong’s Secretary for Home Affairs and a participant in the forum, said China being the only surviving ancient civilization is attributed to its tolerance toward imported cultures and religions, which is partly conferred by Daodejing. He quoted from Daodejing, “the highest good is like that of water.”

Anthropology Professor Jean DeBernardi of University of Alberta, a guest speaker at the forum compared the openness of Taoism and Christianity in her paper. She said that although Christianity also seeks a just and harmonious world, some Christians practice a form of Christianity that does not recognize the spiritual value of other religions, which might undermine religious harmony in a multicultural society.

It was this need for harmony that Xu Jialu, Vice Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, referred to in his keynote address at the forum. Xu said that to build a harmonious society, China should look back to the timeless wisdom in Daodejing. Encouraging different sectors of society to respect each other and work together should be the first step, he said, adding that China could set an example for the world in this regard.

The world has changed enormously since Lao Zi first penned Daodejing, but Tao has not changed, nor has the human mind. If this international forum can popularize the wisdom of Taoism and its virtues in the long term, the tension between individual initiatives and social cohesion may be eased in a young market economy like China. We might then see a turnaround in the attitude of individuals who believe they must only act in their own best interests to achieve success.

Tao Philosophy

The Tao, in the broadest sense, is the way the universe functions, the path taken by natural events. It is characterized by spontaneous creativity and by regular alternations of phenomena (such as day following night) that proceed without effort. Effortless action may be illustrated by the conduct of water, which unresistingly accepts the lowest level and yet wears away the hardest substance. Human beings, following the Tao, must abjure all striving. The ideal state of being, fully attainable only by mystical contemplation, is simplicity and freedom from desire, comparable to that of an infant or an uncarved block.

The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition

Read More...

Bill Maher: Ron Paul Is My New Hero

0 comments

Bill Maher discussed Ron Paul and the highlights of the GOP debate (May 19, 2007) on his show Real Time. Though Maher says that Ron Paul has "no chance" he does support Paul's ideas and the factual correctness of what he said during the debate.

I think America is ready for a change in direction and that Ron Paul has the best plan. Ron Paul does have a chance if he can get the necessary grassroots support. There have been several "long shots" like him in the past that have overcome all odds and brought about a sea change in the nation's politics.

"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." ~Einstein


Read More...

Friday, May 18, 2007

Ron Paul gets people talking on "The View"

1 comments

Joy Behar, Rosie O'Donnell and guest Chandra Wilson debate Elisabeth Hasselbeck over Ron Paul and why we need to re-think foreign policy. Proof that Ron Paul gets people talking and is our only hope for real leadership.

Wrote Casey Khan: "Ron Paul is everywhere. Today my wife and I were looking for a new minivan for our growing family. There was a tv on at the dealership. While I was chasing the 3 year old around, my wife yelled, 'check this out.' Lo and behold, on the horrid daytime tv show The View, I see a gigantic picture of Ron Paul behind the hosts, a blond, a red head, and a brunette. The blond was huffing and puffing the warparty line about Paul's heroic statements critiquing American foreign policy. The red head came back and explained how Ron was merely explaining and critiquing the policy, not blaming the American people nor justifying murder by the terrorists. That's all I saw since I had to make sure my son wasn't destroying Toyota property. My wife told me the segment went on for about 5 minutes, with the infamous Rosie O'Donnell coming to his defense [that can't be helping Ron with conservatives]. In any case, it was great to see Dr. Paul's foreign policy of freedom discussed, of all places, on daytime tv."

Read More...

Giuliani Is Right To Be Outraged

0 comments

by Thomas R. Eddlem | LewRockwell.com

"Wendell, may I comment on that? That's really an extraordinary statement. That's an extraordinary statement, as someone who lived through the attack of September 11, that we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq. I don't think I've heard that before, and I've heard some pretty absurd explanations for September 11th.

"And I would ask the congressman to withdraw that comment and tell us that he didn't really mean that."

– Former New York City Mayor Giuliani, responding in the May 15th Republican presidential debate to Rep. Ron Paul, who suggested Islamic terrorism is fueled by U.S. military interventionism.

"It reminded me of the Saudi Prince that gave me the $10 million. [Rep. Ron Paul] did the same thing. It is America’s fault the way America has outreach in the world. Look, it’s real simple what happened. These people came here and killed us because of our freedom of religion, because of our freedom for women, because they hate us…. The reality is if you are confused about this, I think you’ve put country in much greater jeopardy. "

~ Rudy Giuliani, in a Fox News interview, minutes after the debate


Maybe Rudy Giuliani had a point. After some reflection, I think he was right to be outraged.

It is outrageous to suggest that when we bomb people, they would get mad at us. I mean, it’s not like foreigners have feelings.

It’s outrageous for Ron Paul to expect Rudy Giuliani to have ever "heard that before," even though he could have read the same perspective in the 9/11 Report. After all, he was only the mayor – the chief executive – of New York City during the 9/11 attacks, the worst terrorist attack in American history. Why would anyone suggest he needed to read the official government report on the attacks?

Since it’s outrageous to expect Rudy Giuliani to have to read the 9/11 Report, it’s also outrageous to think that he would have read the part of the 9/11 Report where they outline the principle of blowback in great detail. Heck, he’s only trying to be President of the United States. It’s not like he needs to know about the long-term implications of our foreign policy.

Giuliani is right that we don’t really need to know anything more about our enemies in the Iraq war. Chinese military strategist Sun Tsu counseled: "If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat." But losing half the battles in a war is good enough. It’s outrageous to suggest that Giuliani would need to have read Sun Tsu in order to pursue a war. Again, he’s only running for President of the United States, and it’s not as if he’s trying to be "commander-in-chief" of the military.

We know why the 9/11 attacks occurred. "These people came here and killed us because of our freedom of religion, because of our freedom for women, because they hate us." They hate freedom around the world, and this explains the recent rash of spectacular Islamic terrorist attacks against other free nations that mind their own business, such as Switzerland, Singapore, and Sweden. "Islamo-fascists" target non-interventionist free countries because they hate their freedom too.

To suggest Islamic terrorists don’t target Switzerland and haven’t scored major incidents against the Swiss is outrageous.

It’s outrageous to suggest our war against Iraq was a war of aggression. Everyone this side of Sean Hannity knows that the Iraqis shot at American soldiers while American tanks were rolling through the deserts of Iraq. That was an attack on United States territory. And didn’t Iraqi missiles occasionally fire at American bombers as they flattened buildings in Baghdad? These are clear examples of overt acts of Iraqi aggression against American territory.

To suggest that a nation’s army standing on its own ground and pointing it’s weapons straight up in the air is not an act of aggression against the United States is outrageous.

It’s outrageous to suggest that Iraq had a right to defend its own territory or to suggest that America did not have a national security interest in Iraq. The whole world is our security interest, and under no circumstances can a U.S. President engage in military aggression. To suggest it is even theoretically possible is outrageous.

And besides, it’s outrageous to suggest that the United States had no justification for invading Iraq in the first place.

Everyone at National Review and the Weekly Standard knows that there were "ties" between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda before the war, and that our intelligence agencies reported before the war that the sum of these "ties" consisted of Hussein keeping tabs on his enemies. But "ties" are ties, and that’s all we needed to justify the war.

To point out that the United States government – which in the 1980s had Osama bin Ladin on the CIA payroll in Afghanistan – had stronger ties to al Qaeda than Iraq is outrageous.

And it’s also outrageous to point out the case of Osama bin Ladin as an example of the CIA concept of "blowback."

Anyone who points out blowback caused by presidential military misadventures is clearly saying that the terrorists were right, and that the American people deserved the 9/11 attacks. For Rep. Ron Paul to criticize poor decisions by presidential policymakers and say he is not blaming the American people for 9/11 is outrageous. If you criticize policy-makers, you are criticizing the people. Policymakers are the people – the only people that matter, anyway. Either you are on the side of the Bush Administration – the people – or you are on the side of the terrorists. Rep. Ron Paul should know that.

It is outrageously rude to point out the CIA concept of blowback, and that the 9/11 Commission validated the idea. And it’s outrageous to point out something other than the Bush Administration’s risible, comic book premise that terrorists never kill for any reason other than a philosophical opposition to freedom.

And finally, it’s outrageous for people who want to bring the troops home safely to say they "support the troops." The only ones who support the troops are the ones who want to put them in harm’s way and get them killed.

Yeah, Rudy Giuliani has a right to be outraged. Why shouldn’t he be? Ron Paul is pointing out facts that make Giuliani look outrageous.

Read More...