Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Moon Landing.. A Royal Fake, hear it from those involved.

The following documentary contains interviews with many of the people who were part ofthe U.S. administration during the moon "landing." Their testimony reveals the truth about the space program; it exposes the false footage and coverup.

It was not technologically possible to put a man on the moon, nor is it currently possible to do so. We are still in the dark ages of space travel and may never reach the moon.

Even notrious liars such as Donald Rumsfeld and Henry Kissinger were willing to speak on this documentary; not to mention many individuals who were involved in the Central Intelligence Agency and Whitehouse staff members associated with Nixon.

I hope that you will take the time to review this documentary and process the fact that much of our history, a history that we feel makes us superior to those before us and those outside of our borders is, in fact, a total fabrication. Imagine the implications for the present.





>> permanent link <<

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Actually, the one thing that is conspicuously absent from this 'mockumentary' is any asertion that the moon landing was faked...

...which is what makes this such an intriguing piece of disinformation. I don't have it all sorted out, but (I watched this a few days ago for the first time) the 'bloopers' at the end make it seem like it's all a big joke. But if you do take it seriously, it's only the photos they faked.

And for some reason, NASA has no interest in pointing the Hubble at the alleged landing sites - those woud make some pretty neat pictures, don't you think?

Nixon ordering 150,000 troops to look for the film crew, and the Vietnamese, are far less credible than accounts of Kissinger raping young soldiers in Vietnam, as Kay Griggs describes.

So if you took some friends to see this, insisting that it 'proves' the landings were faked - even though they were, 99.99% sure - they would see it as a joke, make fun of you, and any time you brought the subject up again you'd be derided as a 'conspiracy nut' or 'kook.'

Intriguing disinformation, indeed....